Bellingcat, presented to the public as an independent open-source investigation outlet, receives significant funding from the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED) — which its own founder admitted does what the CIA used to do covertly. Bellingcat's 2020 accounts show it received funding from NED and from Zinc Network, a shadowy intelligence cutout that conducts information warfare for UK government ministries and the US State Department. Founder Eliot Higgins was a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council (2016-2019), NATO's quasi-official think tank. Critics describe it as a pipeline for laundering intelligence talking points into mainstream media.
“Bellingcat is not independent journalism — it is funded by intelligence-linked organizations like the NED and serves as a laundering mechanism for NATO and Western intelligence talking points disguised as 'open source investigation.'”
What they said vs. what the evidence shows
“Bellingcat is an independent international collective of researchers, investigators and citizen journalists. We are transparent about our funding sources.”
— Eliot Higgins (Bellingcat founder) · Apr 2021
SourceFrom “crazy” to confirmed
The Claim Is Made
This is the moment they called it crazy.
When Bellingcat emerged in the mid-2010s as an open-source investigation platform, it filled a particular niche in digital journalism. The outfit, founded by Eliot Higgins, positioned itself as an independent fact-checker using publicly available information to investigate matters of geopolitical importance. Major news outlets cited its work regularly, and it gained credibility through high-profile investigations into topics like the MH17 crash and Russian operations.
The implicit claim was straightforward: here was scrappy, independent journalism operating outside traditional power structures. Bellingcat cultivated an image of resourceful investigators using crowdsourced data and open-source methods to expose inconvenient truths. It became particularly prominent in mainstream coverage of Russia, Syria, and other geopolitical hotspots relevant to Western interests.
When critics began raising questions about Bellingcat's funding sources and institutional affiliations, the standard response was dismissal. Pointing out financial relationships with government-linked entities was framed as conspiracy thinking, a way to discredit inconvenient investigations. The organization maintained that its funding came from diverse sources and that its editorial independence remained intact regardless of who paid the bills.
The documentation tells a different story. Bellingcat's 2020 financial accounts show funding from the US National Endowment for Democracy, an organization whose own founder Allen Weinstein stated performed functions "that the CIA used to do covertly." The same accounts reveal money from Zinc Network, an organization described in investigative reporting as a British intelligence cutout conducting information warfare contracts for UK government ministries and the US State Department. These weren't minor contributors to Bellingcat's budget.
Beyond funding, there's the matter of institutional positioning. Founder Eliot Higgins served as a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council from 2016 to 2019. The Atlantic Council isn't a neutral think tank—it functions as NATO's quasi-official policy arm, with board members drawn directly from NATO member governments and . This position provided Higgins with deep institutional connections to Western security establishments while Bellingcat maintained its public persona as independent journalism.
Get the 5 biggest receipts every week, straight to your inbox — plus an exclusive PDF: The Top 10 Conspiracy Theories Proven True in 2025-2026. No spam. No agenda. Just the papers they couldn't hide.
You just read "Bellingcat is funded by NED, intelligence contractors, and N…". We send ones like this every week.
No one's said anything yet. Be the first to drop your take.
The funding picture matters because it reveals potential alignment of interests rather than journalistic independence. When an organization receives substantial resources from intelligence contractors and NATO-aligned institutions, its investigative priorities and framing naturally reflect those interests. This doesn't automatically mean investigations are fabricated, but it does mean editorial independence exists within narrow boundaries defined by funders.
What makes this partially verified rather than fully verified is that Bellingcat's specific investigations haven't been systematically proven false by the evidence available. The claim is fundamentally about institutional relationships and funding transparency, not about the accuracy of individual reports. However, the structural reality—that an outlet presented as independent journalism is substantially funded by intelligence agencies and NATO structures—is well-documented and difficult to dispute.
This matters for public trust because journalism's credibility depends partly on understanding who's paying for it and what interests might be served. Readers deserve to know that organizations shaping narratives about geopolitical events are funded by the governments and military alliances they cover. Transparency about these relationships doesn't mean the journalism is worthless, but it means consuming it requires understanding the institutional context. That context has been systematically obscured.
Beat the odds
This had a 0.2% chance of leaking — someone talked anyway.
Conspirators
~100Network
Secret kept
5.1 years
Time to 95% exposure
500+ years
