COVID PCR tests run at 40-45 cycles produced massive false positive rates — the WHO quietly updated guidance the day after Biden's inauguration — documented evidence
PARTIAL

COVID PCR tests were widely run at 40-45 cycle thresholds, despite experts warning that anything above 30-35 cycles was likely detecting dead viral fragments rather than active infection. There is no universal threshold for what constitutes a positive result — the Corman-Drosten paper that established the WHO-adopted test never defined positive vs. negative. On January 20, 2021, the day Biden took office, the WHO issued guidance warning that high cycle thresholds could produce biased results.

COVID PCR tests run at 40-45 cycles produced massive false positive rates — the WHO quietly updated guidance the day after Biden's inauguration

HEALTH·April 1, 2020·By Dr. Robert Malone·2.6K upvotes·167 comments
What They Said Was Crazy
The RT-PCR test as described in the Corman-Drosten paper has critical scientific flaws including the absence of a defined positive or negative threshold.
Dr. Robert MaloneApril 1, 2020Source

📄 The Receipts

Cycle threshold responses in SARS-COV2 PCR tests
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8853610/
ACADEMICOpen

⚖️ The Record, Side by Side

What they said vs. what the evidence shows

What They Said

No recorded dismissals for this claim.

What Actually Happened
ACADEMIC

Cycle threshold responses in SARS-COV2 PCR tests

⏳ The Vindication Timeline

From “crazy” to confirmed

The Claim Is Made

This is the moment they called it crazy.

📊 How Right We Were

Evidence strength
0/10
Source diversity
3/10
Community consensus100% agree

The People Speak(167)

No one's said anything yet. Be the first to drop your take.

Related Claims

The COVID lab leak theory went from 'banned misinformation' to mainstream acceptance — the DOE and FBI now assess it as the most likely origin — documented evidencePARTIAL💊 Health & Pharma
@Scientists / WHO Investigators·18h ago

The COVID lab leak theory went from 'banned misinformation' to mainstream acceptance — the DOE and FBI now assess it as the most likely origin

99% PARTIAL

7.9K votes

PARTIAL·0 sources

Dismissed by — Peter Daszak / Lancet Commission

7.9K345ShareSave
Gates/WEF simulated coronavirus pandemic killing 65M - 6 weeks before COVID — documented evidenceDISPUTED💊 Health & Pharma
@Viral Posts / Conspiracy Researchers·18h ago

Gates/WEF simulated coronavirus pandemic killing 65M - 6 weeks before COVID

99% DISPUTED

7.1K votes

🟡DISPUTED·0 sources

Dismissed by — Johns Hopkins

7.1K278ShareSave
Fauci briefed Jan 2020 that NIH funded gain-of-function at Wuhan, denied it publicly — documented evidencePARTIAL💊 Health & Pharma
@EcoHealth Critics·18h ago

Fauci briefed Jan 2020 that NIH funded gain-of-function at Wuhan, denied it publicly

98% PARTIAL

5.7K votes

PARTIAL·0 sources

Dismissed by — Fauci

5.7K234ShareSave
FDA Commissioner joined Pfizer board in 3 months, flagged vaccine-critical tweets for censorship — documented evidencePROVEN RIGHT💊 Health & Pharma
@Media Critics·18h ago

FDA Commissioner joined Pfizer board in 3 months, flagged vaccine-critical tweets for censorship

98% CONFIRMED

5.3K votes

🟢CONFIRMED·0 sources

Dismissed by — Gottlieb

5.3K189ShareSave
Pfizer trial: falsified data, unblinded patients - FDA never inspected whistleblower's site — documented evidenceINVESTIGATING💊 Health & Pharma
@Viral Posts / Conspiracy Researchers·18h ago

Pfizer trial: falsified data, unblinded patients - FDA never inspected whistleblower's site

98% INVESTIGATING

5.3K votes

INVESTIGATING·0 sources

Dismissed by — Pfizer

5.3K198ShareSave
Fauci denied funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, but NIH's own deputy director admitted they did — documented evidencePROVEN RIGHT💊 Health & Pharma
@Dr. Anthony Fauci·18h ago

Fauci denied funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, but NIH's own deputy director admitted they did

98% CONFIRMED

5.2K votes

🟢CONFIRMED·0 sources

Dismissed by — Dr. Anthony Fauci

5.2K312ShareSave

Explore More