
WikiLeaks' Vault 7 release revealed 'Weeping Angel,' a CIA/MI5 joint tool that hacked Samsung smart TVs into a 'Fake-Off' mode, where the TV appeared off but was actually recording audio and transmitting it to CIA servers. The leaks also revealed zero-day exploits for iPhones, Android phones, Windows, and even car computer systems.
“The CIA created its own NSA with less accountability.”
From “crazy” to confirmed
The Claim Is Made
This is the moment they called it crazy.
When WikiLeaks released thousands of classified CIA documents in March 2017, buried among the technical specifications was proof of something that had long been dismissed as paranoid fantasy: the U.S. government had developed tools to turn your television into a listening device.
The tool was called "Weeping Angel," and it represented a collaboration between the CIA and British intelligence agency MI5. According to the leaked documents, Weeping Angel could hack Samsung smart TVs into what the agency called a "Fake-Off" mode. To the owner, the television appeared completely powered down. In reality, the device remained active, silently recording audio from the room and transmitting it directly to CIA servers. The victim would have no way of knowing their living room was under surveillance.
Before Vault 7, this kind of claim existed in the realm of consumer anxiety and tech skepticism. Privacy advocates had warned for years that connected devices could become surveillance vectors. Tech companies dismissed such concerns as overblown. Samsung defended the security of its products. The intelligence community, predictably, said nothing. When ordinary people expressed worry about their smart TVs listening in, they were often met with the standard dismissal: that's just conspiracy thinking.
The Vault 7 leaks changed that calculus entirely. The documents weren't allegations or theory—they were internal CIA technical documentation describing exactly how the tool functioned. The leaks also revealed that Weeping Angel was just one piece of a much larger surveillance infrastructure. The CIA had developed zero-day exploits for iPhones and Android devices. They had ways into Windows systems. They could even compromise vehicle computer systems, according to the released materials.
Get the 5 biggest receipts every week, straight to your inbox — plus an exclusive PDF: The Top 10 Conspiracy Theories Proven True in 2025-2026. No spam. No agenda. Just the papers they couldn't hide.
You just read "CIA Developed Tools to Spy Through Smart TVs Even When Off". We send ones like this every week.
No one's said anything yet. Be the first to drop your take.
Confirmed: They Were Right
The truth comes out. Officially documented.
Confirmed: They Were Right
The truth comes out. Officially documented.
What made these revelations particularly significant was the scope and sophistication involved. This wasn't a theoretical vulnerability that required expert-level hacking skills to exploit. These were tools actively maintained and deployed by one of the world's most powerful intelligence agencies. The fact that such capabilities existed meant they had likely been used. The question of against whom, and how many times, remains partially unanswered.
The official response from U.S. intelligence was muted. There were no emphatic denials. Instead, officials pointed out that Vault 7 contained outdated information, that tools described in the leaks may no longer be operational, and that surveillance activities were conducted under legal frameworks that citizens simply weren't privy to. The implication was clear: yes, we did this, and we reserve the right to do it again if we deem it necessary.
What matters most about Weeping Angel and Vault 7 is not the technical achievement—it's what it revealed about institutional honesty. For years, people raising concerns about smart TV surveillance were told they were paranoid. The technology companies profiting from these devices insisted they were safe. When the truth emerged, there was no apology, no reckoning, no meaningful changes to how these tools were regulated.
Today, millions of people still own connected devices they don't fully understand or trust. Weeping Angel proved that their skepticism wasn't unfounded. It wasn't paranoia. It was reasonable caution based on what the powerful had actually done. The lesson isn't just about surveillance technology. It's about the credibility gap between what institutions claim and what they actually do.
Beat the odds
This had a 0% chance of leaking — someone talked anyway.
Conspirators
~200Network
Secret kept
0.5 years
Time to 95% exposure
500+ years