Skip to main content
ExploreTrendingFresh DropsLeaderboardSearch
+ Drop a Receipt
THEY KNEW

They called us conspiracy theorists. Turns out we were just early. This is where the receipts live.

Navigation

  • Home
  • Explore
  • Trending
  • Fresh Drops
  • Blog
  • Submit
  • Leaderboard
  • Pricing

Categories

  • Government
  • Intelligence
  • Corporate
  • Military
  • Health & Pharma
  • Technology
  • Environmental
  • Finance & Banking
  • Media & Propaganda
  • UFO & Unexplained
  • Legal & Justice
  • Science

Resources

  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • Editorial Team

Legal

  • About
  • Methodology
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • DMCA
  • Corrections
+ Drop a Receipt

THEY KNEW

© 2026 They Knew. All rights reserved.·Privacy·Terms·DMCA

HomeExploreSearchSubmitProfile
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Glossary
  4. /
  5. Off-Label Use

Off-Label Use

Using a drug for purposes not approved by regulatory authorities

Off-label use refers to the prescription or administration of a pharmaceutical product for a purpose, population, dosage, or route of administration not approved by the regulatory authority (the FDA in the United States). While physicians can legally prescribe drugs off-label based on their clinical judgment, pharmaceutical companies are generally prohibited from marketing drugs for unapproved uses.

The prohibition on off-label marketing exists because FDA approval requires rigorous testing demonstrating safety and efficacy for specific indications. Off-label use bypasses this safety framework — patients may be taking drugs whose risks and benefits for their specific condition have never been systematically studied.

Despite the legal prohibition, pharmaceutical companies have repeatedly been caught promoting off-label uses through various channels: funding studies designed to generate data supporting unapproved uses, paying physicians as "key opinion leaders" to give lectures about off-label applications, and using sales representatives to directly promote unapproved uses to prescribers. GlaxoSmithKline paid $3 billion in 2012 to settle charges including off-label promotion of antidepressants for children. Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in 2009 for off-label promotion of multiple drugs. These fines, while large in absolute terms, often represent a fraction of the revenues generated by the off-label sales.

Related Claims on They Knew

Pfizer whistleblower: FDA ignored safety concerns →

Related Terms

Informed ConsentRegulatory CaptureAdverse Event
← Back to Glossary