Between 2013-2014, Credit Suisse arranged $1.15 billion in loans to Mozambique, supposedly for tuna fishing and maritime security. Over $100 million went to kickbacks for Mozambican officials and Credit Suisse employees. When the hidden debts were exposed in 2016, the IMF and World Bank froze support, triggering a currency collapse and sovereign debt crisis that crippled one of Africa's poorest nations. Credit Suisse was fined nearly $500 million. Three bankers were criminally charged.
“Credit Suisse bankers arranged fraudulent loans to Mozambique, taking massive kickbacks that ultimately destroyed the economy of one of the poorest countries in Africa.”
From “crazy” to confirmed
The Claim Is Made
This is the moment they called it crazy.
A $1.15 billion loan deal arranged by Credit Suisse for Mozambique's supposed tuna fishing industry turned into one of the most consequential financial scandals of the 2010s. What began as a straightforward development finance story ended with a sovereign debt crisis that devastated one of Africa's poorest nations and exposed the mechanics of how global banking corruption operates in plain sight.
Between 2013 and 2014, Credit Suisse structured massive loans supposedly designed to fund Mozambique's tuna fishing fleet and maritime security operations. The Swiss bank positioned itself as the arranger and facilitator, with the full knowledge of Mozambican government officials. But the loans were never really about tuna. Over $100 million was siphoned off as kickbacks—payments to Mozambican officials and Credit Suisse employees involved in the deal.
When questioned by regulators and the press, Credit Suisse initially treated the matter as a routine lending arrangement. Officials suggested that if there were irregularities in how the borrowed funds were deployed, that was a matter between Mozambique and its creditors. The bank's response was essentially defensive: we arranged the financing, what happens with it afterward is not our responsibility. This position ignored Credit Suisse's documented knowledge of where the money was actually going.
The truth emerged in 2016 when the hidden debts became public. Mozambique had quietly borrowed $1.15 billion without properly disclosing the obligations to international creditors or its own legislature. The kickback scheme meant the country had taken on massive debt to pay bribes rather than build actual fishing infrastructure. When the International Monetary Fund and World Bank learned the full scope of what had happened, they froze development assistance to Mozambique immediately.
The consequences were swift and brutal. Without IMF and World Bank support, international confidence in Mozambique's currency evaporated. The metical collapsed in value. Mozambique spiraled into a sovereign debt crisis from which it has never fully recovered. A nation already struggling with poverty and limited economic opportunity was pushed deeper into crisis by a single corrupt financing arrangement.
Get the 5 biggest receipts every week, straight to your inbox — plus an exclusive PDF: The Top 10 Conspiracy Theories Proven True in 2025-2026. No spam. No agenda. Just the papers they couldn't hide.
You just read "Credit Suisse bankers took $100M+ in kickbacks on loans to M…". We send ones like this every week.
No one's said anything yet. Be the first to drop your take.
Confirmed: They Were Right
The truth comes out. Officially documented.
Confirmed: They Were Right
The truth comes out. Officially documented.
The evidence against Credit Suisse eventually forced accountability. The bank paid a settlement of nearly $500 million to resolve the matter. Three bankers directly involved in the scheme faced criminal charges. Internal Credit Suisse communications and financial records documented that senior bank officials understood the loans were being used for corruption, not legitimate development purposes.
What makes this case significant is what it reveals about how international finance actually works at the margins. Credit Suisse was a major global institution with compliance departments and regulatory oversight. Yet it willingly participated in a scheme that enriched a handful of individuals while imposing decades of economic suffering on millions of ordinary Mozambicans. The bank's initial dismissal of responsibility, followed by eventual punishment, demonstrates the asymmetry in how corporate accountability operates.
This scandal matters because it shows that massive financial crimes involving developing nations can be documented, verified, and proven—but only after the damage is done. By the time Credit Suisse faced consequences, Mozambique had already lost years of potential development. The episode reminds us that when powerful institutions and corrupt officials align, ordinary people bear the cost.
