Retired Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet testified before Congress in November 2024 that his confirmation of UAP reality came in January 2015 during a pre-deployment naval exercise off the US East Coast. The exercise resulted in the famous 'Go Fast' video showing an F/A-18's sensors recording an object with capabilities beyond any known technology. An email containing the video was distributed to commanding officers by Fleet Forces Command — and the very next day, the email was deleted from all recipients' accounts without explanation. Gallaudet stated there is a 'moral imperative' for disclosure, calling UAPs evidence of 'non-human intelligence,' and supported David Grusch's whistleblower claims.
“Confirmation that UAPs are interacting with humanity came for me in January 2015. The video email was sent by Fleet Forces Command — and the next day, it disappeared from my account and from the accounts of all other recipients.”
What they said vs. what the evidence shows
“The Department has no record of systematically deleting UAP-related communications from military personnel accounts.”
— Pentagon / AARO · Nov 2024
SourceFrom “crazy” to confirmed
The Claim Is Made
This is the moment they called it crazy.
A retired Navy admiral walked into a congressional hearing room in November 2024 with a story about an email that disappeared. Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet's testimony, delivered before the House Oversight Committee, described a moment nearly a decade earlier when military officers received video evidence of something unexplainable—and then that evidence vanished from their inboxes overnight.
Gallaudet's account centers on January 2015, during a pre-deployment naval exercise off the US East Coast. Navy F/A-18 pilots captured video of an object moving through the air with capabilities that defied explanation. The footage, later known as the "Go Fast" video, showed sensor data from military aircraft tracking something that shouldn't exist according to known physics and engineering. Rather than keeping it classified, someone in Fleet Forces Command made a decision to distribute the video via email to commanding officers throughout the fleet.
What happened next is where the story becomes difficult to dismiss. According to Gallaudet's sworn testimony, the email containing this video was deleted from every recipient's account the very next day. Not archived. Not recalled through standard procedures. Simply removed without explanation or notification. The implication was clear: someone wanted this evidence to disappear from the chain of command.
The official response from the Pentagon and military leadership has long been to minimize UAP incidents or classify them entirely. For years, the military maintained that pilots' reports of unexplained aerial phenomena were either sensor artifacts, misidentifications, or classified foreign technology. The institutional stance has been that there's nothing here worth public discussion. When retired officers like Gallaudet began speaking about their experiences, they were largely dismissed as outliers or as having misunderstood what they witnessed.
Get the 5 biggest receipts every week, straight to your inbox — plus an exclusive PDF: The Top 10 Conspiracy Theories Proven True in 2025-2026. No spam. No agenda. Just the papers they couldn't hide.
You just read "Rear Admiral Gallaudet testified that a UFO video was emaile…". We send ones like this every week.
No one's said anything yet. Be the first to drop your take.
But Gallaudet's November 2024 congressional testimony carries weight that earlier dismissals cannot easily overcome. He didn't make vague claims—he provided specific dates, specific operations, and specific details about military command structure and procedures. His written testimony to Congress functions as an official record. He explicitly stated that his belief in non-human intelligence comes directly from this incident and others he witnessed. Perhaps more significantly, his testimony aligns with and supports the whistleblower claims made by David Grusch, who alleged that the U.S. government has recovered non-human craft and reverse-engineered their technology.
The deleted email incident itself remains impossible to independently verify at this point—that's precisely the problem. If the evidence was systematically removed from official channels, reconstructing what happened requires either the cooperation of those who deleted it or the cooperation of someone who saved a copy. Neither appears forthcoming. Yet the fact that a senior military officer, on the record before Congress, describes such an incident suggests that either something remarkable occurred or something remarkably suspicious occurred. Neither possibility reflects well on institutional transparency.
What matters here is not whether we believe aliens visited Earth in 2015. What matters is whether military officers can speak truthfully about their experiences without evidence being erased from official systems. What matters is whether Congress receives complete information about incidents involving military personnel and equipment. Gallaudet's testimony, whether ultimately vindicated or disputed, raises fundamental questions about institutional honesty that deserve answers regardless of what the "Go Fast" video actually shows.
Beat the odds
This had a 0.3% chance of leaking — someone talked anyway.
Conspirators
~500Large op
Secret kept
1.5 years
Time to 95% exposure
500+ years
