What is the verification status of this claim?

This claim is currently marked as "CONFIRMED". The verification is based on 1 primary sources and 1 total sources reviewed by the They Knew community.

Who originally made this claim?

The original source of this claim has not been attributed to a specific individual.

How many sources support this claim?

There are 1 total sources associated with this claim, of which 1 are primary sources (court documents, FOIA releases, official records).

+ Drop a Receipt

THEY KNEW

They called us conspiracy theorists. Turns out we were just early. This is where the receipts live.

Navigation

Home
Explore
Trending
Fresh Drops
Blog
Submit
Leaderboard
Pricing

Resources

Blog
Glossary
Editorial Team

Legal

About
Methodology
Editorial Policy
Privacy
Terms
DMCA
Corrections

+ Drop a Receipt

THEY KNEW

Home Explore Search Submit Profile

Monsanto Papers: Glyphosate Cancer Cover-up Evidence Revealed | They Knew | They Knew

Home
/
Claims
/
Health & Pharma
/
Monsanto ghostwrote studies claiming glyphosate safety while hiding cancer evidence

Monsanto ghostwrote studies claiming glyphosate safety while hiding cancer evidence — documented evidence

CONFIRMED

Court documents from 2017 showed Monsanto employees secretly authored supposedly independent research and knew about potential cancer links since 1980s.

Monsanto ghostwrote studies claiming glyphosate safety while hiding cancer evidence

Health & Pharma·March 14, 2017·2.4K upvotes·153 comments

What They Said Was Crazy

“Glyphosate is safe for humans and extensive independent research confirms no cancer risk”

March 14, 2017Source

The Receipts

★

PRIMARYMonsanto papers: cancer patients claim company covered up glyphosate health risks - The Guardian

www.theguardian.com/business/2017/aug/08/monsanto-...

ARTICLEOpen

The Vindication Timeline

From “crazy” to confirmed

Mar 14, 2017

The Claim Is Made

This is the moment they called it crazy.

📢

Mar 14, 2017

The Claim Is Made

This is the moment they called it crazy.

How Right We Were

Evidence strength

5/10

Source diversity

3/10

Community consensus100% agree

The People Speak(153)

No one's said anything yet. Be the first to drop your take.

Share this receipt

𝕏 Post Reddit Bluesky

Related Claims

PARTIALHealth & Pharma

The COVID lab leak theory went from 'banned misinformation' to mainstream acceptance — the DOE and FBI now assess it as the most likely origin

7.9K

DISPUTEDHealth & Pharma

Gates/WEF simulated coronavirus pandemic killing 65M - 6 weeks before COVID

7.1K

PARTIALHealth & Pharma

Fauci briefed Jan 2020 that NIH funded gain-of-function at Wuhan, denied it publicly

5.7K

INVESTIGATINGHealth & Pharma

Pfizer trial: falsified data, unblinded patients - FDA never inspected whistleblower's site

5.3K

PROVENHealth & Pharma

FDA Commissioner joined Pfizer board in 3 months, flagged vaccine-critical tweets for censorship

5.3K

PROVENHealth & Pharma

Fauci denied funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, but NIH's own deputy director admitted they did

5.2K

Explore More

Explore more Health & Pharmaclaims →Glossary of terms →Browse all claims →

Case File

StatusCONFIRMED

CategoryHealth & Pharma

ClaimedMarch 14, 2017

VerifiedMarch 27, 2026

Sources1 (1 primary)

Upvotes2395

Comments153

UpdatedMarch 27, 2026

𝕏 Post Reddit Bluesky

How This Was Verified

Claims are verified through cross-referencing publicly available court records, government documents, journalistic investigations, and community-submitted evidence. Status reflects current assessment and may change as new evidence emerges.

Learn more →